Talk About a Flake
The media din on Imus is unbearable, but I've been watching this very closely because I think it matters very, very much. I have a few million thoughts on the situation, which I'll refrain from cataloguing here...but I will offer a few things that I feel pretty strongly about.
My disclaimer: I watched the show everyday and have listened for the better part of 15 years. I know the show.
First, context matters. It does not excuse. I've watched incredibly closely, and no excuse was given. Only repeated, genuine apologies, along with a clearly stated plan to address the situation and engage in meaningful dialogue.
I think the presence or lack of malice counts. This is not the same as saying what happened didn't matter even if there was no malice.
The networks are shameful. They are acting high and mighty, and, well, bullshit. 8 days counts, too, and the firings happening on the day when the advertisers bailed is not a coincidence.
Same for the spineless advertisers.
Why are they spineless? Why is it bullshit?
Because the "dialogue" that everyone now wants to have is by and large discontinued. What would have been more helpful...having the perpetrator of the harm be held to account for his actions while he actively seeks atonement for his hideous indiscretion? Or, is it better to ban the guy to Arizona, never to be heard from again, thereby locking the indescretion in place and perpetrating yet another deadlock on the racist language that was used?
I would have prefered the former. We have achieved the latter. I don't think anyone had conducted themselves with any type of maturity or nuance.
It's all about blame, power, and money. What it isn't is about having a constructive dialogue, which is what everyone says they want. But they did everything they could do to clamp down on anything worthwhile. And I'm usually not quite that cynical.
I take it back. There is one entity who have conducted themselves remarkably well. The team of fabulous young women who are filled with grace and dignity.
And I'll also put a vote in for Imus as doing the right thing in his effort to ammend his fabulously stupid remark.
I really think we just lost an important opportunity that was thisclose to being very constructive.
I have other thoughts on this as well, but, you know, enough.
=================
Actually, the questions I'll pose:
- When do we accept apologies?
- How do we understand what the greater good is?
- How do we understand what the greater harm is?
- Why did Imus employ employees who are so clearly racist (remember, I've watched and listened for a long time), and since he's the one who employed them, then what the hell do we do about the questions above?
- Why can't more people understand that we all carry ugly thoughts with us, and our ugly thoughts come through in ugly ways sometimes...but since we all have them, why can't we understand that and try to improve ourselves rather than deny our own shit and project it onto everyone else?
Never mind.
6 Comments:
You raise a great point: We all say that we want to have a meaningful dialogue, but we seem absolutely incapable of having one. (Or is it that we just are unwilling? Maybe both?) Meaningful dialogue regarding race seems to be in that category of meaningful dialogue about politics and religion - we'd all like to see it happen, but it lasts about two minutes before it lapses into something substantially less than meaningful. You are right - we missed an opportunity.
I also couldn't agree more that the players from Rutgers were absolutely amazing in the way they handled this. First, they lose the national championship game, which is hard enough to deal with if you're a highly talented and competitive athlete at the top of your game. In and of itself, that's a very hard thing to process within a week. On top of that, they are thrust into the national spotlight in a way that was horribly awkward for them. But they dealt with it all in a way that really impressed, and quite honestly humbled, me.
Feh.
Imus is a lightweight, consumed in a web of lame-osity in which he was the principle weaver.
Felicity is puzzled by the hub-bub. Friends of Felicity know that the felicity de ville is quite often loaded to the brim with Hos. Ho-Ho's, to be precise, but Ho's none the less.
And Nappy? Felicity is known to Nap to the outer fringe of actual sleep. Sometimes on your coffee table (depending on one’s skill with ropes and duct tape), sometimes at the local post office, but nap I will.
And Head? C'mon. Some things one needn't explain. Felicity encourages you to make your own investigations.
As dear Teodoro suggests consider the context. Here are a few things that Don Imus has not achieved in his long, lame history:
-Shooting one's companion in the face.
-Deceiving the public (but wait, there's more...)
-That same deception resulting in war(s) responsible for the death of 3000 Americans and 100,000 Iraqi & Afghani
-Providing material aid and support to a corporation whose fraud resulted in the loss of pension and benefits for thousands of retirees.
By comparison Naps, Ho-Ho's and Head barely tip the scales of reprehensible behavior.
If the public seeks accountability, I say this: Hop in the back seat of the Felicity De Ville. We shall seek accountability, oh yes. There we shall find accountability, and more.
There is no restraint.
Felicity Taint
Jeepers, where ya been?
Dearest Kevlar,
Felicity has been napping, eating ho-ho's and...um...er....well, let's just say using her head. Picture a long, gleaming Felicity De Ville, pants around one's ankles and snack cake wrappers flying forth from the window and you have a snapshot of la vida Felicity.
Not necessarily in that order, however. There has been, of course, the odd spicy chicken wing and other variations of deviations in my life. Nude romps, full body waxing, feeding christians to the lions, hijinks of that sort. Nothing special, the usual.
There is no restraint.
Felicity
Well if that's not the greatest post I've ever seen I don't know what is.
!
Did I actually write the word "jeepers"? Looks like I did.
Post a Comment
<< Home