Sunday, September 25, 2005

Bonaduce, et al.

Our fair Betsy mentioned the VH1 Bonaduce show to me the other day, and at the time I had only read a few articles about it and seen some commercials. I had also heard Bonaduce on Howard Stern talking about the show. Through all of that, I had a pretty good idea what the show was about...after all, the press and his interviews are not hiding his substance abuse, suicide attempt, out-of-control behavior, etc. Not only are they not hiding it, they are publicizing it.

That said, they don't seem to be exploiting him or his wife. Heck, they are the executive producers. So it is what it is. If they want to exploit themselves, I guess I can't blame VH1. The story goes that VH1 tried to pull out when things got dangerous, so I think they are in the clear (mostly) on this.

Anyway, I saw an episode tonight, and obviously, we're talking about one messed up dude who is in tremendous, tremendous pain. Pretty much unquantifiable pain. And it's on TV. I think I mentioned on Betsy's blog that I tend to root for the guy. I think he means well. I think he cares. I think he's smart and entertaining. He's also as troubled as a person can get, and I have sympathy/empathy for his pathology, of which there is plenty.

My comment (read: problem) is geared towards the publicity of the therapy itself. I'm sure...sure...that the psychologist on the show completely cleared himself legally of all liability. Bonaduce obviously consented to the intrusive break of confidentialtiy. Heck, he sold this idea. So I don't think the therapist did anything wrong legally.

But I don't like it ethically. Therapy is private for a reason. Therapy is complicated and intimate. Therapy chopped up for television is confusing and misleading. The guy could be the best therapist in the world and edit the show himself, and it still would look and feel wrong. I don't like the message it sends to the folks out there that still hold a stigma/prejudice against therapy.

Therapy involves complicated, intricate bits of technique. But make no mistake, it also in involves lots of corny sounding bits like "How does that make you feel?" Any therapist in the world would sound like an idiot if the session were chopped up. Therapy has a flow from session to session, from beginning to end, and before and after. It just can't be captured adequately as a fraction of a 30-minute realitiy show. I think it makes therapy look trivial, biased, corny, ineffective, and like a side-show.

That said, maybe I'm defensive about this. It's likely, even.

But I had the same feeling watching Metallica's movie. I totally knew what the guy was doing, and couldn't blame him for what he did. But it looked stupid to be counseling those bozos in therapy. And that's the point: if I were in his shoes, they aren't bozos. They're just dudes that need help.

Therapy...and the need for therapy...knows no income stratus or type of person. People find pain sometimes, and pain can find people. People need help to find their way out of it. Doesn't matter who you are.

And if Danny Bonaduce can find salvation (what he wants) and health (the minimum I can hope for) on TV, then good for him.

But what about the person on the verge of making his or her first appointment?

7 Comments:

At 9/27/2005 9:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dammit, T, did you have to go saying that so much better than I did? What's funny is that I couldn't get onto your blog the last two days, and after rewriting my post this morning, before I read yours, I acutally also used the phrase "it is what it is". So, for anyone who goes to my blog, I'd like to add; What Ted said.

 
At 9/27/2005 1:52 PM, Blogger Teodoro Callate said...

I didn't say it better. I said it diffrnt. Diffrnt is fine.

 
At 9/27/2005 2:27 PM, Blogger Kevlar Pinata said...

Late again.

I haven't seen the show - just the promos (because I TiVo and then watch "Best Week Ever" religiously) - so I can't comment on that. I did watch, and love, Metallica's "Some Kind of Monster", but my love for it was from its honesty, or at least what seemed to me like honesty. The honesty was more about watching this group of guys struggle through their issues in some really hard and moving ways. That said, I don't think that my dear Teo is criticizing the movie itself; rather, the invasion of the privacy of therapy is what seems a bit off kilter and I'd agree with that.

I can't speak from a position of professional authority on the matter, but I can speak from personal experience - a great deal of which remains private for me. I don't want to over-blog and divulge more than I should, but my experiences have been such that the privacy of those sorts of discussions and courses of treatment have been very helpful to me. I think that if a camera had been rolling, I would have probably put up some kind of personal filter - or front - that would have been counterproductive. And I sort of feel like I'm turning the camera on myself right now, so I'll stop my comment here. :-)

See? Teo is right. Confidentiality is important in these matters.

 
At 9/27/2005 3:55 PM, Blogger Vinnissimo said...

Ugly as it was I learned a lot about seeing the OJ trial. If we had a blog then it'd been lit up.

 
At 9/27/2005 3:57 PM, Blogger Vinnissimo said...

...about heaping up evidence that is

 
At 9/27/2005 5:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with Kevlar, it's hard enough to be honest in therapy - if I were on TV, knowing me I'd either make it seem like I was already cured or that I was the most crazy. That said, I have the sense Danny's being as honest as he's able to be - but I also think he's a typically dishonest addict. Which is part of why it's so painful to watch.

Differently better!

 
At 9/27/2005 6:20 PM, Blogger Teodoro Callate said...

I do get the feeling he's being honest...which doesn't mean that the therapy is done any justice by being televised. That honesty is important for him (even if his honesty is currently bat-shit crazy). But the televising of that honesty is what I'm most concerned about. What about the person who is scared off of therapy because Danny B. is bat-shit nuts? What about the person scared away because he/she doesn't like that particular therapist? What about the person that thinks the whole thing is devalued because it's the latest water-cooler topic of conversation?

These are some reasons that I wish therapists would not agree to do this.

Re: the other points. Yes, I believe people would generally change with cameras. That said, because I'm in training, all of my sessions are audio taped, and therapy can be effective...and you do generally forget the tape recorder is on. So I'm not so worried about that part (in general).

As for self-disclosure, I make no secret that I'm in therapy. I'd like the stigma to be removed. Therapy helps me live a healthy life and improves my well-being. I believe in it to the point that I'm dedicating my life to it. (I say that often...it's not profound...it's just going to be my next job is all.) The contents of my therapy, however, is generally reserved for discussions with my therapist. That's where it belongs. So I don't think anyone here has given anything away. The fact that someone has maybe once or twice spoken to somebody about something is a good thing.

I think therapy should be like going to the dentist. I'm just not sure that televised root canals are a good idea.

And I thought the Metallica movie was about 30 minutes too long, and generally pretty not-so-great. But you can see that I'm biased about it. I was more offended by their songwriting process than anything else. Pablum! This is an entirley different post altogether.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home