Knowingly Schmowingly
Since when is "knowingly" a qualifier that gets you off the hook?
Rafael Palmeiro, Mr. I Never Knowingly Took A Steroid. President Bush, Mr. I Believe Rafael Palmeiro Never Knowingly Took A Steroid. Politics and baseball have always had an odd and not-quite-right relationship. And that actually looked like it was about to change for the better, except our Commander in Chief used to own the Texas Rangers, so he feels the need to protect Palmeiro (former Ranger when Bush owned the team) despite the fact that Palmeiro has tested positive for a steroid that is not available in supplements, thereby making the "Knowingly" part of the statement an outright lie. But our Pres believes him.
And this post is not about politics. Really, it isn't. The non-denial denial, the non-apology apology, the use of knowingly...makes me crazy. How many times have we read: "I never knowingly ________. If you were offended, I apologize. I never meant to cause such harm to my friends and family. If you were affected by ________, for that, I apologize."
Makes me nuts. How about: "I was wrong. I take responsibility for my actions, and I will do my very best to both correct and not repeat my mistakes. I apologize for ______, and I ask your forgiveness. I will take the necessary steps to atone for my actions."
That's probably not what I'd say to an individual person. But if I were writing a PR statement, it might look like that. Maybe the word "atone" would freak people out. It could be re-worded, but the point is that you take responsibility and you move on and do your best to be better.
But this "knowingly" qualifier and "if you were offended" have simply got to go. Because "knowingly"'s got nothing to do with it and "if you were offended" is itself offensive. And it's almost always a lie, and it's always responsibility dodged once again.
8 Comments:
I could NOT agree more. It's like that Olympics/abortion clinic/gay bar-bombing guy I ranted about on - er - another blog. All asking his mother to forgive him for something he "cannot apologize" for. Baloney.
And it IS offensive (quick jump back to the "I'm sorry you were offended" thread ... which is not quite the same as the "I'm sorry I bombed a clinic" thread.) It SOUNDS like an apology, but it REALLY means "I pity you for being so damn touchy. That must suck for you."
But the "I'm sorry I did something illegal and ignoble by accident" thing is just dumb, though. And thus insulting. Sheesh.
Agreed. Whenever anyone takes the "I'm sorry if you were offended..." approach, it drives me a bit nuts. How about simply "I said something stupid and I shouldn't have. I apologize for that."?
Didn't "knowingly" take steroids? From the info that's leaking out, the steroid in question has to administered something like two to three times a week, either through injection or ingestion. (I'm no doctor, but I play one on a blog.) That sounds pretty knowing to me.
And an aside to the President: I'm thinking you might just want to take a pass on public statements regarding Mr. Palmeiro. I don't think Chris Tucker won any awards by sticking up for Michael Jackson, and I believe that cozying up to a potential Hall of Famer who just skewered himself - and our national pastime - on a stick is a notso hotso strategic move for a president who has earned just a little skepticism from the public. Just my two cents, Mr. President.
Also: Palmeiro pitched Viagra. Insert joke here.
patronizing driveler
wait...
i love everybody
nevermind
I like the phrase "patronizing driveler", except in such circumstances where it is being used to describe me.
I have never knowingly posted to this blog.
I have never knowingly offended you, and if I have, I am truly sorry.
i thought ignorance was no excuse for breaking the law/doing something wrong. like just because you don't get your phone bill for 6 months, doesn't mean you aren't responsible for paying them.... you have to call them and see where the hell they are. just cause you don't know something is not the law, doesn't mean you aren't responsible when you do it.
right? isn't that a legal tenet?
Post a Comment
<< Home